Secondary forest products collected by forest people in the Loita Hills of Kenya. (Photo by R. Butler)
SECONDARY FOREST PRODUCTS
By Rhett Butler | Last updated July 22, 2012
Large-scale development of secondary forest products could be one path toward boosting local and national income without destroying forests. Some forest products can be domesticated and cultivated on highly degraded and formerly forested lands. Many of these products are better suited to the tropical
environment and can produce greater economic returns than imported temperate species.
As discussed earlier, small farmers can be incorporated into the national economy and large-scale agricultural
production through small agroforestry plots that feed into the wider market.
There are a wide range of rainforest products that can be harvested at lower cost to the environment than widely harvested crops brought in from elsewhere. The keys are to developing these products at scale, bringing them to market, and then marketing them, while always working to ensure that damage to the environment is minimized.
Many of the foods we eat today have their origins in the rainforest, including the avocado, banana, Brazil nuts,
cassava/manioc, cashews, chocolate/cocoa, cinnamon, cloves, coconut, coffee, cola, corn/maize, eggplant, fig, ginger,
grapefruit, guava, herbal tea ingredients, jalapeno, lemon, mango, orange, papaya, peanut, pepper, pineapple, potato,
rice, squash, sugar cane, tomato, and vanilla. But there are still many more that have yet to be developed to their
fullest potential: of the 3,000 rainforest fruits, only 200 are regularly used.
Of the estimated 25,000 to 30,000 species of plants that have edible parts, only about 7,000 have been cultivated
or collected. Of these, only 20 species provide 90 percent of the food needs, while rice, wheat, and maize
make up more than 50 percent of caloric intake. Tropical agriculture with conventional crops has often proven to be
a failure because tropical forest lands are rife with pests, disease, poor soils, drought, and inconsistent rainfall.
Tropical agriculture based on these few crops rarely eases poverty for local people — most benefits accrue to large landowners and corporation.
What is needed is experimentation with other plants, especially those that would be better situated to cultivation in the tropics.
For example, the Buruti palm of the Amazon produces a vitamin-rich fruit with a bread-like pith, while two plants
from West Africa produce compounds thousands of times sweeter than sucrose and could be used as natural sweeteners.
There are already examples of breakthrough plants. Witness the surge in popularity for açai berries derived from an Amazon palm tree. While expansion has had some negative social and environmental impacts, açai can be cultivated in a way that is minimally damaging. Meanwhile sago palm in Southeast Asia is used widely as a starch in sweets and grows better when cultivated in a mixed forest habitat rather than a single-species plantation.
Similarly, rainforest animals have great potential as semi-domesticated food animals for the tropics. These are
better suited to the tropical climate and tropical ecosystems than domestic animals brought from more temperate
climates that can be destructive of the rainforest lands and species. Using native animals means lower environmental
impact, greater diversity of animal-based foods, and greater efficiency of production than cattle ranching.
Tropical species with potential as sources of meat include Amazon river turtles (Podocnemus sp), which have long
been harvested (usually unsustainably) from their native habitat for their tasty meat. These turtles
can be easily cultivated in cement ponds located along the floodplains of tropical rivers and raised on aquatic
vegetation and fruit. The turtle produces 22,000 pounds of meat per acre (24,659 kg per hectare) more than 400
times the yield of cattle raised in pastures and in a far less costly manner to the environment.
The green iguana of Central and South America has been over-hunted for its chicken-like meat and is endangered
in some of its range. The iguana is already being raised commercially in farms in Central America. Iguanas
can be ten times as productive in terms of yield as cattle on the same land, reducing the need to clear additional
forest areas for pasture. The capybara (the world's largest rodent), chachalacas (like tropical chickens), and paca
(cat-sized rodents) are other New World mammals that could provide sources of tropical meat without major disruption
to the ecosystem. These are just a sampling (from the New World alone) of tropical species that could productively
replace temperate domestic animals in the tropics.
A comprehensive look at the use of animals in Brazilian medicine
PROVIDERS OF GENETIC DIVERSITY
In 2010, wheat grew on 838,700 square miles (217 million hectares) of land around the world. With an average of 2 million
stalks per hectare, the total number of individuals exceeds 434 trillion individuals. Clearly wheat is not an endangered
species, but because of selective breeding toward genetic uniformity, wheat has lost most of its populations and
hence its genetic variability. What is the recourse if a disease breaks out in this gargantuan monoculture? Most
likely scientists will scour the few wild places left on Earth for the remaining wild strains of wheat in hopes
of finding genetic traits that will offer resistance to the pest.
Grains: Savings from Genetic Resources
Loss of livestock breeds put food supplies at risk in poor countries
Rotten cacao pods in Sulawesi. Sulawesi is the world's third leading producer of cacao but its crop has been hard hit by cocoa pod borer and disease. Ongoing research on the Indonesian island is looking at ways to control these agricultural pathogens.
In addition to food, rainforests serve as reservoirs of genetic diversity. These wild species have traits that have been inadvertently removed by selective breeding, a process which selects traits based primarily on their utility to man. Thus domesticated plants and animals are more susceptible to pests
and disease. To protect domestic species from these hazards, they can be bred with wild species that still retain
traits protecting them from agricultural pests.
The most famous example of the value of wild gene pools comes from Asia in the 1970s when the rice crop was struck with grassy stunt virus, threatening the rice crop across
the continent. The International Rice Institute surveyed some 6,273 varieties of rice for attributes against grassy
stunt. Of this array, only one, inhabiting a small Indian valley slated to be cleared and developed, proved to
have the desired qualities. It was crossed with the predominant form of rice, creating a resistant hybrid, and
was subsequently bred across Asia. Had it not been for this tiny reservoir of diversity, Asia would have faced
a deadly human catastrophe. Today the ICCO (the International Cocoa Organization) is seeking out new strains of
cocoa in the Orinoco and Amazon rainforests. The ICCO is searching for varieties that will improve the yield and
resistance of commercially grown cocoa, which has a very narrow genetic base. For example, the entire cocoa agriculture
of Ghana, a major world cocoa producer, is derived from a single pod brought in the 1870s by a visiting blacksmith. Commercial oil palm and rubber face similar risks from narrow genetic bases.
- Why is genetic diversity important for agriculture?
Other versions of this page
print version | spanish | french | portuguese
| chinese | japanese
Continued / Next:
Other pages in this section:
NGO: conflict of interests behind Peruvian highway proposal in the Amazon
(05/16/2013) As Peru's legislature debates the merits of building the Purús highway through the Amazon rainforest, a new report by Global Witness alleges that the project has been aggressively pushed by those with a financial stake in opening up the remote area to logging and mining. Roads built in the Amazon lead to spikes in deforestation, mining, poaching and other extractive activities as remote areas become suddenly accessible. The road in question would cut through parts of the Peruvian Amazon rich in biodiversity and home to indigenous tribes who have chosen to live in "voluntary isolation."
Analysis: Indonesia renews moratorium on logging, palm plantations
(05/16/2013) Indonesia’s President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono made a bold and courageous decision this week to extend the country’s forest moratorium. With this decision, which aims to prevent new clearing of primary forests and peat lands for another two years, the government could help protect valuable forests and drive sustainable development.
What if companies actually had to compensate society for environmental destruction?
(04/29/2013) The environment is a public good. We all share and depend on clean water, a stable atmosphere, and abundant biodiversity for survival, not to mention health and societal well-being. But under our current global economy, industries can often destroy and pollute the environment—degrading public health and communities—without paying adequate compensation to the public good. Economists call this process "externalizing costs," i.e. the cost of environmental degradation in many cases is borne by society, instead of the companies that cause it. A new report from TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity), conducted by Trucost, highlights the scale of the problem: unpriced natural capital (i.e. that which is not taken into account by the global market) was worth $7.3 trillion in 2009, equal to 13 percent of that year's global economic output.
'Carbon bubble' could cause next global financial crisis
(04/22/2013) The world could be heading for a major economic crisis as stock markets inflate an investment bubble in fossil fuels to the tune of trillions of dollars, according to leading economists. "The financial crisis has shown what happens when risks accumulate unnoticed," said Lord (Nicholas) Stern, a professor at the London School of Economics. He said the risk was "very big indeed" and that almost all investors and regulators were failing to address it.
Fighting deforestation—and corruption—in Indonesia
(04/11/2013) The basic premise of the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) program seems simple: rich nations pay tropical countries for preserving their forests. Yet the program has made relatively limited progress on the ground since 2007, when the concept got tentative go-ahead during U.N. climate talks in Bali. The reasons for the stagnation are myriad, but despite the simplicity of the idea, implementing REDD+ is extraordinarily complex. Still the last few years have provided lessons for new pilot projects by testing what does and doesn't work. Today a number of countries have REDD+ projects, some of which are even generating carbon credits in voluntary markets. By supporting credibly certified projects, companies and individuals can claim to "offset" their emissions by keeping forests standing. However one of the countries expected to benefit most from REDD+ has been largely on the sidelines. Indonesia's REDD+ program has been held up by numerous factors, but perhaps the biggest challenge for REDD+ in Indonesia is corruption.
More rainforest news