TROPICAL RAINFORESTS: Saving What Remains
 Home
 What's New
 About
 Rainforests
   Mission
   Introduction
   Characteristics
   Biodiversity
   The Canopy
   Forest Floor
   Forest Waters
   Indigenous People
   Deforestation
   Consequences
   Saving Rainforests
   Amazon rainforest
   Borneo rainforest
   Congo rainforest
   Country Profiles
   Statistics
   Works Cited
   For Kids
   For Teachers
   Photos/Images
   Expert Interviews
   Rainforest News
  Forest data
   Global deforestation
   Tropical deforestation
   By country
   Deforestation charts
   Regional forest data
   Deforestation drivers
 XML Feeds
 Other Languages
   Chinese
   French
   German
   Japanese
   Portuguese
   Spanish
 Pictures
 Books
 Links
 Newsletter
 Education
 Mongabay Sites
   Kids' site
   Travel Tips
   Tropical Fish
   Madagascar
 Contact



About this site
Providing tropical forest news, statistics, photos, and information, rainforests.mongabay.com is the world's most popular rainforest site. [more]



Weekly Newsletter
Enter your email:
Mongabay will never distribute your email address or send spam.





Share

Rainforest in Malaysia. (Photo by R. Butler)

Intergovernmental Institutions

Until recently the concept of sustainable development was foreign to the principal organizations funding development projects, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The World Bank, a multilateral development bank that lends money to help countries develop economically through financing infrastructure and new industries, has historically funded numerous projects that resulted in the destruction of rainforests. The IMF shares a similar record.

The bank has traditionally funded "mega-projects" because they are easier to administer than a number of small projects. Because of the size of these projects, World Bank loans to developing countries are usually substantial, sometimes in the billion-dollar range, adding further debt pressure. In 1987 the bank granted loans exceeding US$15 billion to tropical countries. Some developing countries lack heavy-equipment industries, so a portion of the loan is often returned to the contributing countries in the form of payments for industrialized products and materials.

The influence of the World Bank is powerful, and other organizations follow its lead by sponsoring similarly destructive projects. The bank primarily used economic rate of return as its means of selecting projects, and virtually ignored the social and ecological costs. The result has been many socially and environmentally damaging projects like the Brazilian Tucuri Dam, which displaced 25,000 people and submerged 900 square miles of rainforest; the Polonoroeste road-building project, which promoted the colonization of the rainforests of Rondonia, Brazil, by one million peasant farmers; and the Indonesian transmigration program.

However, in recent years, the World Bank and such organizations have designed a number of useful and successful projects that are considerably more sustainable, while promoting economic returns as well. Today these institutions staff environmental consultants to raise concerns over the impacts of new projects.

The Global Environmental Facility (GEF), established in 1990 by the World Bank, UN Environmental Program, and UN Development program, has committed hundreds of millions of dollars to setting up national parks, promoting sustainable forestry, and establishing conservation trust funds in developing countries. In August 1994, the World Bank inspection panel was established as a independent body to create a legal mechanism for individuals and organizations whose interests are adversely affected by bank-backed projects. Through it, investigation can be conducted to correct mistakes and ensure that the bank enforces its own policies. The panel was put to the test in 1995, for the first time, when Latin America challenged a World Bank project, Planafloro—a loan of US$167 million to Rondonia, Brazil. The challengers cited mismanagement and social/environmental degradation from a previous loan as their reason for submitting their claim. In 1996, the World Bank withheld a loan to Papua New Guinea after it failed to conform with its timber regulations (although the bank has since granted the loan). In 1999 the World Bank weakened the panel.

The World Bank is currently wooing loggers to participate in sustainable forestry projects. The implementation of these and future reforms may prevent the bank from sponsoring further Tucuri-scale projects. Environmental reform of the World Bank lies in the hands of the developed nations since they control the majority of the votes. The member nations vote on what projects to finance and therefore have control over World Bank activities.

In December 2005, the World Bank granted the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) $90 million to support the central African country's transition from instability and civil war. The grant addresses key areas in DRC's forestry sector including strengthening an existing moratorium on new logging concessions "until such a time when a strategy for the use of DRC's forest resources is elaborated, in consultation with all affected and potentially affected stakeholders, including indigenous people, and is duly adopted," according to a bank statement. Further, the grant requires an independent review of the legality of all existing concessions and the publication of all concessions awarded to date. The World Bank says these measures are expected "to help increase transparency and to promote the environmentally sustainable and socially responsible use of DRC's forests."

The World Bank is increasingly funding small community projects that more directly benefit the local economy and are often less environmentally destructive. Because decisions are made on a local level, projects can be better adapted to local conditions.

In June 1997, WWF and the World Bank announced a global alliance for forest conservation and sustainable use. The plan called for the protection of 10 percent of each of the world's major forest types by the year 2000 by establishing large areas of forests under "real" sustainable management. While the plan failed to meet its goal, it was a major commitment towards greener practices on the part of the World Bank. In 2005 the WWF-World Bank Forest Alliance announced an ambitious global program aimed at reducing global deforestation rates by 10 percent by 2010. The Forest Alliance continues to look promising because it forces countries to live up to their conservation commitments or risk their standing with international financial institutions. Such alliances between groups with different constituents are vital to future conservation efforts.

Intergovernmental Institutions Involved in Rainforest Conservation


Suggested reading
  • Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution by Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins
  • Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things by William McDonough and Michael Braungart
  • Consilience : The Unity of Knowledge by Edward O. Wilson
  • Biomimicry : Innovation Inspired by Nature by Janine M. Benyus
  • The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits by C. K. Prahalad
  • Medicine Quest by Mark J. Plotkin
  • The Ecology of Commerce by Paul Hawken

  • Review questions:
    • Why were past World Bank projects often destructive?
    • How has the World Bank changed its approach towards the environment?

    [print version | spanish


    Other pages in this section:
    Solutions Introduction
    Sustainable Forest Products
    Large-scale Forest Products
    Medicinal Drugs
    Logging
    Logging (con't)
    Oil
    Conservation Priorities
    Reserve Size & Valuation
    Organization
    Intergovernmental Institutions
    Communication, Education
    Indigenous people
    - - - -
    References (1)
    References (2)
    References (3)
    References (4)
    References (5)
    Eco-tourism
    Foods & Genetic Diversity
    Medicinal Drugs & Pesticides
    Logging (con't)
    Cattle
    Increasing Productivity
    Types of Reserves
    Funding
    Developing nations
    NGOs
    International Organizations
    Conclusion

    - - - -
    Kids version of this section
    - How can we save rainforests?
    - Education
    - Rehabilitation
    - Sustainable development
    - Parks
    - Eco-friendly companies
    - Ecotourism
    - What you can do




    Recent news

    Deforestation emissions should be shared between producer and consumer, argues study
    (11/19/2009) Under the Kyoto Protocol the nation that produces carbon emission takes responsibility for them, but what about when the country is producing carbon-intensive goods for consumer demand beyond its borders? For example while China is now the world's highest carbon emitter, 50 percent of its growth over the last year was due to producing goods for wealthy countries like the EU and the United States which have, in a sense, outsourced their manufacturing emissions to China. A new study in Environmental Research Letters presents a possible model for making certain that both producer and consumer share responsibility for emissions in an area so far neglected by studies of this kind: deforestation and land-use change.


    Oil palm workers still below poverty line, despite Minister's statements
    (11/19/2009) On October 19th, Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Tan Sri Bernard Dompok told parliament that oil palm harvesters and rubber tappers are living above Malaysia's national poverty line, according to a story in the Malaysian Insider. But now representatives of the workers are saying Dompok lied.


    Coastal habitats may sequester 50 times more carbon than tropical forests by area
    (11/16/2009) Highly endangered coastal habitats are incredibly effective in sequestering carbon and locking it away in soil, according to a new paper in a report by the IUCN. The paper attests that coastal habitats—such as mangroves, sea grasses, and salt marhses—sequester as much as 50 times the amount of carbon in their soil per hectare as tropical forest. "The key difference between these coastal habitats and forests is that mangroves, seagrasses and the plants in salt marshes are extremely efficient at burying carbon in the sediment below them where it can stay for centuries or even millennia."


    DNA uncovers nearly extinct Siamese crocodiles in captivity
    (11/15/2009) The Critically Endangered Siamese crocodile, once believed to be extinct in the wild, received some uplifting news this week. DNA testing of 69 rescued crocodiles at Phnom Tama Wildlife Rescue Center (PTWRC) in Cambodia found 35 purebred Siamese crocodiles.


    New report: boreal forests contain more carbon than tropical forest per hectare
    (11/12/2009) A new report states that boreal forests store nearly twice as much carbon as tropical forests per hectare: a fact which researchers say should make the conservation of boreal forests as important as tropical in climate change negotiations. The report from the Canadian Boreal Initiative and the Boreal Songbird Initiative, entitled "The Carbon the World Forgot", estimates that the boreal forest—which survives in massive swathes across Alaska, Canada, Northern Europe, and Russia—stores 22 percent of all carbon on the earth's land surface. According to the study the boreal contains 703 gigatons of carbon, while the world's tropical forests contain 375 gigatons.



    More news on rainforest conservation


    More rainforest news
    what's new | rainforests home | for kids | help | madagascar | search | about | languages | contact



    Copyright Rhett Butler 1994-2009

    "Rainforest" is used interchangeably with "rain forest" on this site. "Jungle" is generally not used.