Dani man in Indonesian New Guinea. (Photo by R. Butler)
GRASSROOTS MOVEMENTS IN RAINFOREST CONSERVATION
By Rhett Butler
| Last updated July 22, 2012
Non-governmental organizations are a driving force behind conservation efforts today. These non-profit groups
fund and support all aspects of conservation from initial research to protected-area initiatives to implementation
through park management and community-based conservation schemes to alliance building between government agencies
and private interests. They support and coordinate grassroots movements, promote communication between all parties,
and sponsor education initiatives in both developing and developed countries.
With the recent worldwide trend of governmental decentralization, control of forest resources is increasingly turned
over to local governments and non-governmental agencies. One result from decentralization is that forestry decisions
can be made on a local level, more in relation to local conditions and the benefit of local peoples. In recent
years, numerous local groups have assumed the role of promoting local sustainable use that more directly benefits
those living in and around the forests.
Local grassroots movements, where they exist, are often the most successful form of action. These movements are
sometimes able to create enough of a disturbance to delay loggers and developers from exploiting forest lands valued
by local people. Grassroots movements usually result from new or increased presence of pressures on the forest
from commercial interests. These movements put up protests, work to reform local laws and education, and are quite
often the site for innovation and experimentation for new ideas in forest conservation.
Provided they have adequate resources, small grassroots projects can have a higher likelihood of success than foreign conservation projects directed
from a distance. There is good reason for this success, since local organizations are better able to weave conservation projects into the local fabric of life, and their projects tend to be substantially smaller. These small projects can serve models for the larger national and international projects. Before adopting a conservation or land-management plan, it should be proven on a local level.
In some countries, these small movements were sometimes brutally suppressed by governments, but that is changing as grassroots efforts spread around the globe. In the 1980s the rubber tappers of Brazil became one of the best known movements. They successfully campaigned to win title to forest lands in the form of "extractive reserves" — protected areas where forest products are sustainably harvested by local communities. Another well-known initiative was led by the late Wangari Maathai, who was the first African woman awarded the Nobel Prize for her efforts. Her Greenbelt Movement led to the planting of hundreds of millions of trees around the globe.
- Why are grassroots movements often successful in conservation efforts?
Other versions of this page
spanish | french | portuguese
| chinese | japanese
Continued / Next:
Other pages in this section:
Selection of information sources
Ecuador will have referendum on fate of Yasuni after activists collect over 700,000 signatures
(04/16/2014) In what is a major victory for environmentalists, campaigners with United for Yasuni have collected 727,947 signatures triggering a national referendum on whether or not oil drilling should proceed in three blocs of Yasuni National Park in Ecuador.
Nearly a thousand environmental activists murdered since 2002
(04/15/2014) At least 908 people were murdered for taking a stand to defend the environment between 2002 and 2013, according to a new report today from Global Witness, which shows a dramatic uptick in the murder rate during the past four years. Notably, the report appears on the same day that another NGO, Survival International, released a video of a gunman terrorizing a Guarani indigenous community in Brazil.
Cargill commits to zero deforestation, but environmentalists have questions
(04/09/2014) After years of criticism from environmental groups, Cargill says it will establish policies to eliminate deforestation, peatlands conversion, and social conflict from its palm oil supply chain. But activists aren't yet sure what to make of the agribusiness giant's pledge. On Tuesday Cargill released a letter it sent to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), a body that sets eco-certification standards, in response to a Greenpeace Report linking it to deforestation.
More news on activism
More rainforest news